Disposable “Devils”

Chinese, Pakistani, and Indian news media reported Osama bin Laden dead as early as 2002. This was briefly discussed on CNN several years on, and reports of his alleged death (either through natural, peaceful means, or by way of assassination) have surfaced numerous times since he became such a household name on September 11th, 2001. Quite obviously, his existence legitimized the so-called “War on Terror” for the better part of a decade. He was, once upon a time, incredibly useful to Neoconservative scare-tacticians. Now that bin Laden is pronounced dead (never mind a trial, let alone an autopsy), I predict the familiar snap of a false flag on the horizon. Zionists in D.C. and Tel Aviv will prove incredibly swift to blame “those who hate our freedom”, thereby justifying the ruthless pursuit of their next regional ambitions. A nuclear strike on Iran? Another tour in Lebanon? Devouring untold hectares of what remains of Palestine? A showdown with Turkey? Libya? Jordan? Egypt? All of the above, for “Greater Israel“? Meanwhile, we are casually assured that Osama bin Laden’s remains have been “buried at sea” — “in accordance with Muslim traditions”? Right — because the dismal caliber of men who celebrate the criminal ambush and assassination of their convenient “devil” are suddenly quite sensitive when it comes to the question of religious customs and due reverence in matters of burial. How god damned ignorant and indifferent must the world be to swallow any angle of this tired farce? Who is more detestable? The deceivers, or the gullible? -W.