Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Political Correctness’ Category

Read Full Post »


Mind Wars: Raising Healthy White Children in a Subversive Environment
by Christian Miller
Source: The Occidental Observer

Above all, a White child must be raised to exhibit White behavior: to strive towards truth, honor, and a virtuous life.  Exemplary White men and White women from the past and present provide guidance for behavior expected in the future.  Familiarity with admirable White role models will help protect a developing mind from poisonous, nonsensical, cowardly, and traitorous ideas.  The alternative is the loss of yet another young White mind and spirit, overwhelmed from all sides in today’s twisted and subversive society.

Popular music and professional sports are teeming with African themes of criminality, cruelty, misogyny, egotism, and debased and debauched behavior.  Television, movies, and advertising are infected with a virulent strain of anti-White propaganda.  Academia, mainstream news, politicians, and pundits provide a persistent message of White guilt, racial nihilism, and shrill condemnation of any manifestation of White pride or White identity.  Jewish ownership and control of the media is so pervasive that Jewish media figures feel secure enough to boast thereof.  Yet to an untrained observer, the subversion towards Jewish interests or anti-White propaganda can be difficult to spot because it is designed to permeate the unconscious brain.  The viewer, or victim, is supposed to feel and absorb, not think and reflect.  Conscientious White parents must prepare their children with the analytical tools to see through the façade.

An inert consumer, or a passive viewer, will unconsciously accept the bald-faced lies and distortions via the path of the least resistance.  Floating down the river in a stupefied trance is easier than swimming upstream against the tide of brainwashing.  Responsible White parents must be vigilant and tirelessly optimistic while pursuing their most important endeavor—raising the next generation of the White race.

The dark and subversive forces behind cultural Marxism and anti-White propaganda work incessantly to poison young minds with destructive and stultifying ideas.  Children will be immersed in a swirl of dusky faces in mainstream entertainment, carefully choreographed to mask unpleasant truths.  Doctors, lawyers, judges, generals, heroes, scientists, and positions of authority or expertise will be overwhelmingly casted as Black, mestizo, or other non-White actors, in stark contrast to reality.  The message is clear: the absence of an overwhelming presence of non-Whites in prestigious positions (i.e. reality) means that racism is afoot, and race-based social engineering or wealth redistribution is the solution.  Be careful to point out these distortions to a young child and encourage the child to ascertain the truth of the matter.

Image from AltRight. Caption: Black Computer Nerd (Jaleel White), Black President (Blair Underwood), Black God (Morgan Freeman) http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/zeitgeist/negrophilia/

Data regarding racial differences in Bar Exam passage rates, medical board scores, high school and college dropout rates, SAT/GRE/GMAT/MCAT scores, incarceration rates, and the relative numbers of minorities in positions requiring a high IQ are readily available via books, data studies, or Internet research.  The empirical argument of racial disparities in achievement is quite easy to advance, which is why a steady stream of false propaganda is used to distort the truth.  How many Black computer science or mathematics professors exist compared to the Black population?  How many Black astronauts, Rhodes Scholars, or jet pilots are there?  How many mestizo neurosurgeons, composers, or chemical engineers have risen to prominence?  By direct contrast, what is the Black and mestizo share of the prison population?  Be sure to provide the child with a firm grounding in the relative achievements, behavioral tendencies, and capabilities of the races.  Otherwise, the mainstream media will provide incredibly dangerous distortions, such as Black docility or passivity.

Be sure to provide an extremely important research project to the child—a comparison of racial crime rates.  Parents who love their children will not dare to hide the reality of racial crime rates because ignorance in this area can be fatal.  Perpetrators of rape, robbery, assault, and murder are not distributed evenly among the races, and White children must be aware.  Every White child must know the color of crime.  It is tragic to allow a White child to learn about interracial crime “the hard way.”  Instill healthy racial instincts, or rather, provide an environment in which these natural instincts will not be repressed.

Of paramount importance is a strong sense of White identity, pride, and duty.  Each White person is an unbroken link to the past and the future of the White race.  Remind the child of the sacrifices made, hardships endured, and trials faced by countless White ancestors.  Inform the child that each prior generation made the wise and just decision to seek a mate who could continue the lineage of the White race.  Make it clear that to break this chain of life is to spit upon the grave of every White ancestor, and to burn the bridge towards a White future, cursing all future progeny to a confused life of diluted identity.  When the child is mature enough to understand scientific concepts, provide a solid foundation of genetics and heredity.

White phenotypes are as delicate as they are beautiful.  Reinforce the idea that the beauty of the White race is largely a recessive trait.  Whites are the only race to produce the full spectrum of colors: blond, red, brown, grey, and black hair and blue, green, grey, and brown eyes.  Note that all other races are uniform and homogenous by comparison, with monochromatic hair and eye color.  Reinforce the concept that a White person breeding with a non-White person creates a non-White, invariably.  Only a White man and a White woman can produce a White child.  Miscegenation precludes the possibility of producing a White child, forever damning the future generations to a darker reality.  White genes are precious and must be preserved and guarded carefully.

Point out that when a Black man violates the sanctity of a blond White woman’s womb, the result will be a mulatto—a person that the same Black man would not find as beautiful as the blond White woman.  Hence, miscegenation demonstrates its own underlying depravity—destroying what one loves or admires.  The singer Seal and the golfer Tiger Woods spawned nappy-headed mulattos that look nothing like the beautiful White women who bore them.  The White genes came to a screeching halt the moment they intermixed with African or mixed-blood genes.  The resulting offspring are dark-skinned and broad-nosed, inheriting none of the aesthetic delicacy of their White beauty-queen mothers.  A visible shame of cosmic proportions follows the squandering of fine White genes.

Parents may worry that the child will fall prey to the lies of “race is a social construct” or “race is only skin deep.”  Rejoice, White parents—the mountainous mass of evidence on this subject makes these fallacies easily disproven.  A quick study of racial differences in bone density, fertility, prognathism, skull shape, susceptibility to various diseases, or rates of maturation will expose that race is more than skin deep and has a profound genetic significance.

To truly enforce the importance of racial distinctions, it is vital to introduce the child to racial differences in IQ, brain size, aggression, personality disorders, altruism, and sexual promiscuity.  The mental and moral differences are most important to explain why some races fail so often and represent outrageous shares of the violent criminal population.  A young child can quickly understand that painting a Black man white does not make him a White man.  An older, more mature young man can dive into the complexities of racial differences in intelligence, criminality, personality, and time preferences.  Eventually it will become apparent that the best retort for “race is a social construct” is “society is a racial construct.”  Society, civilization, and nation must be understood as historical expressions of racial stock.

History in public schools is taught as a meaningless mishmash of competing cultures, devoid of racial importance, coalescing in the modern age of enlightenment wherein everyone “realized” that race is nothing and environment is everything.  The enemies of the White race make it so easy to refute their pernicious ideas!  Kill two birds with one stone by teaching the child both accurate world history and the skills necessary to test a thesis by alternative hypotheses.  Ask the child why, if environment is so important, sub-Saharan Africans dwelled in a blessed abundance of natural resources, literally standing on diamonds in some cases, yet never invented the wheel or written language.  Spark the child’s imagination and hypothetical ability by proposing a world where the Africans in Haiti are magically replaced by Scandinavians, or Japanese.  Ponder whether Haiti would be different in a decade and most importantly, ask why.  Point out the stark contrast between the French-ruled Haiti, “Jewel of the Caribbean,” and the Black-controlled Haiti, embarrassment of the Western Hemisphere.  A curious child with a healthy appetite for truth will be able to apply these simple lessons to refute the fallacious explanations for disparities of civilization and culture.  As more and more examples come to light, the child will gain an important lesson—the effect of human race on human civilization.

Provide specific examples of civilizations that crumbled as their White genetic founding stocks were slowly destroyed through miscegenation with subjugated, absorbed, or enslaved foreigners: Persia, Greece, Rome, Egypt, and India.  “Browning out” is a concept every White child must understand.  India provides a long-view demonstration of the evils of miscegenation.  Teach the child about the Aryan imposition of the caste system in ancient India.  Note the present condition of the very-brown India, where the caste system has failed, which stands as a testament to the iron rule of race.

Bring the child to a museum to view artifacts of the early Egyptian dynasties, ruled by White pharaohs such as the red-haired Ramses II.  Review the tablets that colorfully depict White Egyptians conquering and enslaving Black Nubians and swarthy Semites.  Be sure to find a picture of the Pharaoh’s walking stick or scepter with Black and Arab heads attached and the sandals with images of Nubians and Semites on the soles.  Of course, these items signify the proud White Egyptian ruler holding the foreign enemies in his hand and treading upon them as he walked.  The racial distinctions in the early glories of Egypt are crystal-clear in the archaeology.  Next examine the art and relics of the later dynasties, which demonstrate a definite Black and Arab admixture in the royal bloodlines.  Note the coincidence of a failing Egyptian empire with the advent of half-blood princes.  Query the young child if the election of the mulatto Barack Hussein Obama as President of the United States of America in 2008 signaled an analogous point in American history.  The rise and fall of civilizations can be one of the most exciting and enriching ways to learn about the importance of race.  A White child must understand his or her special place in the continuation of society, civilization, and nation.

From a young age, a White child must be instilled with a sense of racial duty to the past, present, and future.  White women must know that to bear and raise White children is a glorious honor, not something to be ashamed of or to dread.  Never allow any family member to partake in the denigration of housewives or domestic activity.  Mothers and other women must be properly protected, cherished, and celebrated as the guardians of the next generation, the keys to the future of the White race.  White men must understand that duty will mold their decisions in life, inspiration will spur their creations, and honor will guide their desires.  A White man accepts responsibility without question, provides for his family, protects his loved ones and friends, rises to all challenges, and proudly serves as a soldier-at-arms in the unending march of the White race throughout the history of this world and beyond.  Aryan means “noble” or “of noble blood.”  The White men and White women of the future must be true Aryans in blood, mind, body, and spirit.

Read Full Post »

Martin Luther King Broadcast Causes Controversy

School board member and radio station manager attacked by ADL, receives death threats for MLK commentary

by Kevin Alfred Strom
Source: nationalvanguard.org

A GUEST EDITORIAL — based largely on my exposé of Martin Luther King — has been airing on Greeley, Colorado’s KELS-FM twice daily in the days leading up to the federal MLK holiday, and the sparks are flying as the Usual Suspects try to get the truth off the air — and punish the man responsible for the broadcast.

Brett Reese (pictured), who is a school board member and director of the local school district, runs Greeley’s KELS 104.7. He says he regularly broadcasts guest editorials from listeners if their facts check out. And, he adds, in this case the facts did check out when he looked into them: “Martin Luther King, Junior” is an assumed name; King had numerous and intimate connections to high-level agents of the Communist Party; King misappropriated funds contributed to his “religious” charity and spent them on prostitutes and drunken orgies; and King was a plagiarist who cheated to obtain his PhD. You can listen to the editorial by clicking the link below.

KELS 20110107 Martin Luther King. Right-click and save as to download.

Reese says he’s not a White supremacist (and, of course, neither am I nor are most of the people so accused by the media) and actually admires King’s “civil rights movement,” but believes there are issues with the character of King that make it necessary to question the uncritical adulation and reverence he is accorded today. Reese adds, “I was taught growing up that Martin Luther King Jr. was a hero of history and to question his motivation or integrity was near sacrilege. I support the idea of being able to talk about historical facts. If these facts are out there, then we should be able to talk about them. There should not be a taboo on an honest discussion of history.”

When other school board members expressed their disapproval of the broadcasts and said he shouldn’t be making them, Reese responded: “Just because I am on the school board does not mean I have to accept Martin Luther King Jr. or any figure of history as above reproach or question. Asking a school board member to take an oath of blind allegiance and then check his brain at the door may be the root of the problems in our district today.” Reese did agree to moderate some of the language in the editorial, but said it will continue to run.

The Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which has links to Meyer Lansky’s organized crime syndicate and which once gave their “Torch of Liberty” award to mob boss Moe Dalitz, has attacked Reese and demanded that the guest editorials cease: “The reckless and irresponsible spread of such misleading vitriol only heightens the divisions in our communities….” said ADL Regional Director Scott L. Levin (also a “Torch of Liberty” recipient), adding “We call upon Mr. Reese to desist from his divisive public broadcasts….” Immediately after the ADL’s attacks on him, Reese began receiving death threats that he considered credible. Reese has broadcast the critical MLK editorial for three years running around the MLK holiday, but never received death threats until the ADL, whose “phone tree” notification of Jewish activists is well known, publicized him in the last few days.

Because of the death threats, Mr. Reese has reluctantly decided to attend future school board meetings armed: “Because of the recent school board shooting (in Florida) and the recent death threats, I have to,” he stated to the Greeley Tribune. (Apparently the Tribune itself is fearful of the implications of this story, since they state on their Web site — at the bottom of every article on this subject — “Due to the sensitive nature of this story, the commenting feature has been disabled.”)

Clayborne Carson, the founding director of the “Martin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute” at Stanford University and the editor of King’s papers, admitted, according to the Tribune, that “many of the claims in the broadcast have been substantiated,” but added that many historical figures are flawed: “The significant thing about King is he did great work as part of a great movement. If you disagree with that, then there is discussion. The thing about plagiarism, yeah we know he plagiarized some academic papers, but how does that relate to the fact that he was one of the great orators of history?”

Although the MLK critique specifically states that opposing viewpoints are welcome, Reese says that in three years not one has been submitted, with opponents preferring to force the guest editorial off the air rather than engage in open debate. But KELS listeners are a different story. Reese says “It was new information to many of our listeners. It promoted discussions within our listening community and we had listeners call and thank us for airing it.”

Please see video HERE.

Read Full Post »


The Beast as Saint: The Truth About Martin Luther King
by Kevin Alfred Strom (the text of a speech given by Mr. Strom in 1994 on the nationwide radio program, American Dissident Voices)
Source: nationalvanguard.org

WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But even more insidious than the theft of the people’s weapons was the theft of their history. Official Communist “historians” rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many countries, revered national heroes were excised from the history books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit Communist ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted into official “saints.” Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts who murdered countless nations. Did you know that much the same process has occurred right here in America?

Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy of adulation for the so-called “Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr.” King has even had a national holiday declared in his honor, an honor accorded to no other American, not Washington, not Jefferson, not Lincoln. (Washington and Lincoln no longer have holidays — they share the generic-sounding “President’s Day.”) A liberal judge has sealed the FBI files on King until the year 2027. What are they hiding? Let’s take a look at this modern-day plastic god.

Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the time only as “Daddy King.” “Daddy King” named his son Michael. In 1935, “Daddy King” had an inspiration to name himself after the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his congregation that henceforth they were to refer to him as “Martin Luther King” and to his son as “Martin Luther King, Jr.” None of this name changing was ever legalized in court. “Daddy” King’s son’s real name is to this day Michael King.

King’s Brazen Cheating

We read in Michael Hoffman’s Holiday for a Cheater:

The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled “Life is What You Make It,” according to the testimony of King’s best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams. The first book that King wrote, Stride Toward Freedom, was plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow. And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose staff includes King’s widow Coretta), stated of King’s writings at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary: “Judged retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism…. Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his major field of graduate study, systematic theology.” King’s essay, “The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,” written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar S. Brightman, author of The Finding of God. Another of King’s theses, “Contemporary Continental Theology,” written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton. King’s doctoral dissertation, “A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman,” for which he was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer, “The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich’s Concept of God.”

According to The Martin Luther King Papers, in King’s dissertation “only 49 per cent. of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five or more words that were King’s own….”!

In The Journal of American History, June 1991, page 87, David J. Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that King’s wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated cheating. Reading Garrow’s article, one is led to the inescapable conclusion that King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary. Why, then, one might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89: “King’s academic compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost without exception little more than summary descriptions… and comparisons of other’s writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting that King’s professors did not expect more….”

The editors of The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers state that “…the failure of King’s teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is somewhat remarkable….”

But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us “…actually the malfeasance of the professors is not at all remarkable. King was politically correct, he was Black, and he had ambitions. The leftist [professors were] happy to award a doctorate to such a candidate no matter how much fraud was involved. Nor is it any wonder that it has taken forty years for the truth about King’s record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be made public.”

Monument reminiscent of Soviet 'socialist realism'Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King’s vision of a racially mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his cheating for decades. The cover-up still continues. From the New York Times of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that, “There is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation.” However, despite its finding, the committee said that “No thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King’s doctoral degree,” an action the panel said “would serve no purpose.”

No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful fraud as a student, the titles “reverend” and the “doctor” should be removed from King’s name.

Communist Beliefs and Connections

Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn’t really “Martin Luther King, Jr.” What’s left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people.

On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate demonstrations and riots.

Bayard RustinFrom 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King’s associate, advisor, and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23, 1953 the Los Angeles Times reported his conviction and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter’s ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.

Fred ShuttlesworthSoon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized the first of King’s famous marches on Washington. The official organ of the Communist Party, The Worker, openly declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left King’s employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1964.

Bayard Rustin’s replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King was Jack O’Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O’Dell. According to official records, in 1962 Jack O’Dell was a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O’Dell was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis Globe-Democrat of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O’Dell’s party membership became known.

What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired O’Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare, immediately hired him again as director of the New York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the Richmond News-Leader of September 27, 1963.

Robert C. Williams, of Havana's Radio Free DixieIn 1963 a Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King’s 1964 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf of King’s movement. Mr. Williams was also around this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he made regular broadcasts to the southern United States, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title “Radio Free Dixie.” In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by Blacks against White Americans.

During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled Negroes With Guns. The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than “Martin Luther King, Jr.” It is also interesting to note that the editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

According to King’s biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, “King privately described himself as a Marxist.” In his 1981 book, The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, “…we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution…. The whole structure of American life must be changed…. We are engaged in the class struggle.”

Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King’s behind-the-scenes “handler.” Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA, was King’s mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King’s more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King’s book, Stride Toward Freedom. It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King’s income tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King’s speeches. King described Levison as one of his “closest friends.”

FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money

The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been aware of Stanley Levison’s Communist activities. It was Levison’s close association with King that brought about the initial FBI interest in King.

Assistant FBI Director SullivanLest you be tempted to believe the controlled media’s lie about “racists” in the FBI being out to “get” King, you should be aware that the man most responsible for the FBI’s probe of King was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself as a liberal, and says that initially “I was one hundred per cent. for King…because I saw him as an effective and badly needed leader for the Black people in their desire for civil rights.” The probe of King not only confirmed their suspicions about King’s Communist beliefs and associations, but it also revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.

According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed to the “civil rights” movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King’s speaking and organizing tours.

In fact, an outfit called the “National Civil Rights Museum” in Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he was shot, has declined to depict in any way the occupants of those rooms. That—according to exhibit designer Gerard Eisterhold—would be “close to blasphemy.” The reason? “Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.” spent his last night on Earth having sexual intercourse with two women at the motel and physically beating and abusing a third.

Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of numerous married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years with the Bureau had seen everything there was to be seen of the seamy side of life, King was one of only seven people he had ever encountered who was such a total degenerate.

Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King’s supposedly “non-violent” marches, Sullivan’s probe revealed a very different King from the carefully crafted public image. King welcomed members of many different Black groups as members of his SCLC, many of them advocates and practitioners of violence. King’s only admonition on the subject was that they should embrace “tactical nonviolence.”

Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a financial conference with Communist Party representatives, not knowing that one of the participants was an infiltrator actually working for the FBI.

King idol at the National CathedralJ. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information on King’s Communist connections was provided to the President and to Congress. And conclusive information from FBI files was also provided to major newspapers and news wire services. But were the American people informed of King’s real nature? No, for even in the 1960s, the fix was in—the controlled media and the bought politicians were bound and determined to push their racial mixing program on America. King was their man and nothing was going to get in their way. With a few minor exceptions, these facts have been kept from the American people. The pro-King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even reported that a serious proposal has been made to add some of King’s writings as a new book in the Bible.

Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of this man called King.

I want you to start to think for yourselves.

I want you to consider this: What are the forces and motivation behind the controlled media’s active promotion of King?

Our children are victims of propaganda.What does it tell you about our politicians when you see them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to honor King as a national hero?

What does it tell you about our society when any public criticism of this moral leper and Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal?

What does it tell you about the controlled media when you see how they have successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture of King that can only be described as a colossal lie?

You need to think, my fellow Americans. You desperately need to wake up.

__________________

Bibliography

1. Hoffman, Michael A., Holiday for a Cheater, (Wiswell Ruffin House, Dresden, New York, 1992)

2. Steffgen, Kent H., Bondage of the Free, (Vanguard Books, Berkeley, California, 1966)

3. Garrow, David J., The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., (W. W. Norton & Co, New York City, 1981)

Further information on King’s Communist connections and the FBI surveillance of Stanley Levison can be found in the Congressional Record.

Read Full Post »

The story is nearly four years old now. It was swept under the rug, because, as Malkin suggested, it doesn’t fit the established narrative. She could have easily gone further here, but too much honesty in her line of work is equivalent to “career suicide”. Nevertheless, the sad reality (a clear indication of how troublesome the situation has become today) is that if everything that needed to be said these days were simply spoken by, say, an Asian woman instead of a White man, the world would likely lend an ear. If knowledge empowers, then ignorance disarms. What we do not know (or what we choose to ignore), then, empowers those who would do us harm. When one is better acquainted with the alarming criminal statistics data by race (yes, I know it’s an unpopular subject), and when one is better acquainted with the disproportionate control over our mainstream news and entertainment media by a hostile elite (2% controls something like 98%), it is difficult not to interpret the burial of the grisly Christian-Newsom case as an altogether different form of racial attack. When I read about such stories, I don’t think of it as an attack against some distant strangers. I think of these stories (and the burial of such stories) in terms of an attack against my friends and my family, directly. This couple are part of our extended family. This attack could just as easily happen to any of our loved ones, so four years ago (for me, anyhow) might as well have been yesterday. It breaks my heart to know that our people tend to ignore such a message for fear of being branded “racists”. To want to survive today is, in the eyes of some, “racist”. Sign of the times! Everyone else is encouraged to celebrate their heritage and empower their people, but if we so much as protest along the road to the slaughterhouse (which is what voluntarily disempowerment leads to), we’ve “got something wrong with us”. This is the direct result of 100 years of pathologizing ethnic-self-interests where our race is concerned. We can thank the Frankfurt School and their “critical theory“. Ours is the only race, apparently, which is not supposed to exist. Again and again, they say “there is no White race.” If we don’t even recognize that we exist as a people, the failure to protest as a people inevitably follows. I protest because I intend to survive and prevail, come what may, and because I want my friends and family to do likewise — however unpopular and unacceptable that may seem today. Those who condemn this consciousness today will applaud it tomorrow, for none of us — not a one — will survive without it. -W.

Read Full Post »

The Enemy Within
By Kevin Alfred Strom
Source: National Vanguard

THIS WORTHWHILE video by Schell Productions is a brief and fascinating look at the origins of the “anti-racial” movement that has paralyzed the nations of the West and was in fact designed to destroy our will to live. It takes as its central premise the ideas of Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique.

Philosophy’s purpose being to distinguish the good in life from the bad and thereby to guide our actions, the most important philosophical precept which our age has discovered is that Good is whatever advances our evolution, and Evil is whatever opposes or reverses that evolution.

Evolution creates races in abundance, in grasses and fish and birds as well as in men. It is a branching process. Race-creation is central and necessary to evolution.

Without race-genesis and separation, speciation — the creation of new species — would be impossible.

In fact, without race-genesis and separation, all evolution and all life on Earth would have been impossible. Therefore the anti-racial movement which has gained temporary ascendance in the West is profoundly evil.

Related Articles:



Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »